text
| 1 | # Research Brief |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Turns an open question into a sourced, skimmable brief. Decomposes the question, |
| 4 | builds a search plan that deliberately looks for disconfirming evidence (not just |
| 5 | confirming), grades every source, tracks every claim to its source(s) in a claim |
| 6 | ledger, and writes up findings with honest confidence levels — distinguishing |
| 7 | well-corroborated claims from single-source or disputed ones. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ## When to use |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - Answering an open-ended "should we / is it true that / what's the state of X" |
| 12 | question that deserves more than an off-the-cuff answer. |
| 13 | - Producing something shareable — a brief a reader can check, not just a paragraph of |
| 14 | assertions. |
| 15 | - Any research task where being wrong confidently is worse than being appropriately |
| 16 | uncertain (technical decisions, due diligence, fact-checking). |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Install |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ```bash |
| 21 | npx openagents-cli add openagents/research-brief |
| 22 | ``` |
| 23 | |
| 24 | | Runtime | Installed to | |
| 25 | |---|---| |
| 26 | | `claude-code` | `.claude/skills/research-brief/` | |
| 27 | | `cursor` | `.cursor/rules/research-brief/` | |
| 28 | | `codex` | `.codex/skills/research-brief/` | |
| 29 | | `openai-agents` | `.openai-agents/research-brief/` | |
| 30 | | `generic` | `.openagents/research-brief/` | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ## Inputs |
| 33 | |
| 34 | | name | type | required | default | description | |
| 35 | |---|---|---|---|---| |
| 36 | | `question` | string | yes | — | The question or claim to research | |
| 37 | | `depth` | string | no | `standard` | `quick` (3-5 sources), `standard` (6-12), `deep` (12+, diverse source types) | |
| 38 | | `audience` | string | no | — | Who the brief is for, to calibrate depth/framing | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ## Example run |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ``` |
| 43 | > Write a research brief on whether we should adopt library X over Y for our queue. |
| 44 | ``` |
| 45 | |
| 46 | The agent decomposes the question (capability differences, maintenance health, known |
| 47 | limitations, migration cost), searches for both supporting *and* disconfirming |
| 48 | evidence per sub-question, grades each source (`source-grading.md`), builds a claim |
| 49 | ledger, and writes the result with `templates/brief.md` — leading with a direct |
| 50 | bottom-line answer and an honest confidence rating. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## Files |
| 53 | |
| 54 | - `SKILL.md` — the decompose/search/grade/ledger/write procedure (entry point). |
| 55 | - `source-grading.md` — the A–F source reliability scale and rules for using it. |
| 56 | - `templates/brief.md` — the brief output format. |
| 57 | |
| 58 | ## Limitations |
| 59 | |
| 60 | - Quality depends on what's actually searchable/accessible in the runtime environment; |
| 61 | paywalled or non-indexed primary sources may be represented only via secondary |
| 62 | citations, noted as such. |
| 63 | - Does not independently verify claims beyond cross-referencing sources — it is not a |
| 64 | substitute for expert review on highly technical or high-stakes questions. |
| 65 | - `deep` runs take meaningfully longer due to the larger source count and deliberate |
| 66 | type diversity requirement. |
| 67 |